THE ORDERS I HAVE SUBMITTED TO THE HIGH COURT WERE PLACED UNFAIRLEY AS IS DEFINED IN ARTICLE 6 OF THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS.

Says Tony Barnertt

I HAVE HAD SUGGESTED TO ME BY THE HIGH COURT CIVIL DIVISION TO MAKE ALL EFFORTS TO RESOLVE THESE MATTERS PRIOR TO MAKING AN APLICATION TO THE HIGH COURT TO HAVE THE ORDERS LIFTED.

THE ORDERS I HAVE SUBMITTED TO THE HIGH COURT WERE PLACED UNFAIRLEY AS IS DEFINED IN ARTICLE 6 OF THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS.

THE ORDERS I WISH FOR THIS COURT TO RE-EXAMINE THROUGH FULL DISCLOSURE ARE;

1, THE INJUNCTION NOT TO ENTER HARTLEBURY COMMON CL68 AND THE COURT COSTS ORDERED BY JUDGE KHAN.

2, THE SUSPENDED PRISON TERMS ORDERED BY JUDGE RUNDALL OF TWO I MONTH PERIODS AND THE SUPPORT/ UPHELD ORDERS BY JUDGE KHAN.

I AM AWARE THAT AN ORDER FOR FULL DISCLOSURE IN ORDER TO HAVE THE LAND REGISTRATION EXTINGUISHED AND FOR THE LIFTING OF THE ORDERS WILL NEED TO BE MADE.

THESE MATTERS HAVE ALSO BEEN PLACED BEFORE THE CHURCH COMMISSION ON THE RECOMMENDATION OF BUCKINGHAM PALACE, A FULL REPORT ALSO HAS BEEN SENT TO LORD NEUBERGER.