Says Tony Barnett

LIKE ALL THE OTHER SO CALLED CONSERVATIONIST'S, WILDLIFE TRUSTS,NATURAL ENGLAND, BUTTERFLY CONSERVATION, THEIR AGENDAS IS SELECTIVE, DOES NOT EMBRACE NATURAL PHENOMENA, THEY WISH TO TURN COMMON LANDS AND OTHER PUBLIC OPEN ACCESS INTO "RESERVES", ANOTHER WAY OF SELECTION OF SPECIES, THIS THEN IS SSSI.

SSSI, FIRST "S",STANDS FOR "SITE", AND AS IS NOW DEMONSTRATED MEANS THE ENTIRE AREA, TREES SHRUBS, TO INCLUDE ALL FLORA AND FAUNA.

THE OBJECTIVE IS TO PROHIBIT ACCESS AS HAS ALWAYS BEEN THE RIGHTS OF BOTH COMMONERS AND PUBLIC, AND WILDLIFE NOT REQUIRED IN THEIR SSSI AGENDA.

WE THE TAX PAYER, EMPLOY THESE PARASITES, BUT THEN AGAIN WE HAVE NO OTHER CHOICE, SHOUT AS LOUD AS YOU MIGHT.

I HAVE NOW APPEALED TO BHS TO JOIN THE NON RIDERS TO LOBBY DEFRA AND PINS, THIS TO DEMAND FULL DISCLOSURE WHEN APPLICATIONS ARE MADE, SO THAT "LEGAL OWNERS" ONLY APPLY TO PINS, AND NON OWNERS TO DEFRA, WITH FULL DISCLOSURE/STATUTORY DECLARATION.

PINS ATTACH A SUPPLEMENTARY TO ALL CONSENTS, WHICH MEANS THAT PROVIDING THE WORKS ARE NOT IN BREACH OF ANY ENACTMENTS, BYE-LAWS, WILL BE LAWFUL, THIS THEN SHOULD BE AN INDICATION TO THE APPLICANT TO SEARCH THE LEGISLATION AND COMMONS REGISTER.

THE SAME WILL ALSO APPLY THE APPLICANTS TO DEFRA, BUT THE APPLICANT, HAVING STATED THAT THEY ARE NOT APPLYING AS OWNERS, BUT NEVERTHELESS, THE LEGISLATION SHOULD BE EXAMINED.

THE LAW PROVIDES THAT ANYONE MAY MAKE AN APPLICATION, SO NONE OWNERS HAVE THIS RIGHT.

AS WITH THE RSPB, APPEALS TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC AS WELLAS HMRC BY THE QUANGOS AND PARASITIC CONSERVATIONISTS CONTINUES, LOCAL AUTHORITIES, ARE RETIRED BY LAW TO COMPILE A COMMON OWNERS REGISTER, HOW MANY HAVE COMPLIED WITH THAT OBLIGATION IS NOW COMING FORWARD AS THEY TO ARE APPLYING AS OWNERS OF COMMON LAND TO PINS, AND ARE ALSO TAKING CASH FROM NATURAL ENGLAND, THESE CRIMINALS ARE NOT FIT FOR PURPOSE AND SHOULD BE TREATED ACCORDINGLY.

Says Steve Yandall.

The politics within organisations frequently impairs their function.I would love BHS to make an exception and form a 'union' to combat the clear(to us)agenda that is resulting in the erosion of public access.Ultimately this will result in public demands to drop funding but the short termism(even HLS is only a 10 year cycle)reflects the inability of those driving the imposition to understand consequences.

Were the organisations that profess a value regarding access (Ramblers/BHS/OSS etc) true to their function they would,in this instance, embrace each other and be fighting on our behalf to gain the full panoply of environmental benefits rather than the restricted conservation benefits so poorly prescribed via Europe and gleefully accepted by minority beneficiaries who directly gain from grazing and fencing whilst the rest of Europe struggles to pay for former profligacy.

Bloody terrifying John Bull and Boadicea in the same place!!