Important news for every rider
FOR THE FIRST TIME A BRITISH COURT HAS ORDERED A LOCAL COUNCIL TO PROVE THEY OWN THE LAND THEY CLAIM THEY OWN
This is the implication behind Shrewsbury Magistrates Court decision to refer Tony Barnett to the Crown Court on Monday August 20 2012.
For the Court ordered that a conservation charity, The Butterfly Trust, whose supporters include David Attenborough and Alan Titchmarsh, must prove that when they bought Whitchurchheath Common in Shropshire the land had originally been owned by the local Council.
Tony Barnett explains the full story
ON THE 9th JULY 2012, AT SHREWSBURY COUNTY COURT, THE PRESIDING COURT OFFICAL, CONFIRMED, SUBJECT TO MY APPLICATION, THAT I MAY BE REFERRED TO THE CROWN COURT, IN SHREWSBURY.
THE SAME COURT OFFICIAL ALSO CONFIRMED THAT I MAY ALSO ISSUE APPLICATIONS FOR FULL DISCLOSURE/WITNESS ATTENDANCE FOR THE HEARING SCHEDULED, HOPEFULLY, FOR THE CONCLUSION TO THESE MATTERS, WHICH BEGAN IN 2001.
Says Tony Barnett
I ATTENDED COURT ON THE 9th WITH WELL ESTABLISHED FRIENDS, WITHOUT, AT MY OWN DECISION, NOT TO HAVE LEGAL REPRESENTATION.
THE REASONS FOR MY DECISION TO DEFEND MYSELF WAS BECAUSE SOLICITORS, NOT ONLY WITHIN THE COUNTY OF SHROPSHIRE, BUT ALSO IN NEIGHBOURING COUNTIES, FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH “MY” INSTRUCTIONS.
SO WHAT WAS/IS THE POINT OF MISUSE OF PUBLIC MONIES TO PAY FOR A SERVICE THAT IN MY EXPERIENCE, IS NO MORE THAN A “MONEY EARNER” FOR FIRMS OF SOLICITORS, AND LEAVES THE “CLIENT” IN A WORSE STATE, THEN THEY WERE BEFORE GOING TO COURT?
I WILL ACCEPT THAT COMMON LAND LAW IS VERY COMPLEX, BUT, OTHER LAWS, PASSED BY PARLIAMENT, AND GIVEN ROYAL ASSENT, RUNS ALONGSIDE COMMON LAND LEGISLATION.
THE FRAUD ACT IS ONE, FALSE REPRESENTATIONS, IS UPPERMOST IN THESE MATTERS, THIS ACT ON ITS OWN CARRIES A PRISON TERM, AND BECAUSE THE SAME CLAIMS MADE IN THE COURTS, BY THE CLAIMANTS, AMOUNTS TO PERJURY, ANOTHER PRISON TERM.
THE CRIMINAL DAMAGE ACT TO COMMON LANDS, WITHOUT REASONABLE EXCUSE, HAD THE FIRST ACT OF FALSE REPRESENTATION/PERJURY BEEN EXAMINED, THEN THE COURTS COULD NOT HAVE REACHED ANY OTHER CONCLUSION.
USING PROPERTY, NOT BELONGING TO AN APPLICANT AS COLLATERAL, IN THE WORDS OF PAUL OSBORNE, A “CONVEYANCE SOLICITOR” AT ROYTHORNE & Co IN SPALDING, IS “MORTGAGE FRAUD”.
MEMBERS OF BUTTERFLY CONSERVATION, AIDED AND ABETTED BY SHROPSHIRES NATURAL ENGLAND AND SHROPSHIRE WILDLIFE TRUST, APPLIED FOR FUNDING FROM HMRC (THE PUBLIC PURSE) FOR FRAUDULENT USE (£571,000’s WORTH).
PAUL OSBORNE IDENTIFIED THAT AS MORTGAGE FRAUD, WHICH ALSO INCLUDED HIS COLLEAGUE PHILIP COOKSON, AND CLIENT; GRAHAME-JAMES-FITZTHARDINGE-BERKELEY, OWNER OF PREES HEATH Ltd.
A FULL HISTORY (REPEATED MANY TIMES) OF THE ABOVE STATEMENT, HAS BEEN DISCLOSED TO SOLICITORS AND BARRISTERS, AND ULTIMATLY TO THE COURTS, WHICH INCLUDED DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE, THE TRUE SAYING OF “NO SENSE IN KNOCKING WHEN ON ONE’S IN” FITS.
THE COURTS IN THEIR “WISDOM” ISSUE Cost’s, OR INJUNCTIONS, WHICH I DO NOT COMPLY WITH, THERE HAS BEEN NO EVIDENCE DISCLOSED TO SHOW THAT THE PROSECUTION HAS PROVEN ANYTHING AND THAT OF THE CLAIMANTS ALSO, HOW CAN THAT BE JUSTIFIED.
A REBELION IN THE HOUSE OF LORDS, EXPLAINS MY REASONS FOR NON COMPLIANCE, IF IT IS RIGHT FOR THE HOUSE OF LORDS, IT IS RIGHT FOR ALL OF HER MAGESTY’S SUBJECTS, QUOTE;
We trade our natural freedom “in return” for equal access to the protection of the law.
When that access is denied, then the contract is broken and all bets are off.
There is no obligation for one side to fulfil their part, when the others refuse!
IN THE INTERESTS OF MY COLLEAGUES AT COMMON HERITAGE, AND MYSELF AND FAMILY, WIFE AND ANIMALS, I AM AGAIN PREPARED TO LSITEN TO A FIRM OF SOLICITORS, THAT IN THE PAST, I DISMISSED, FOR THE REASONS PREVIOUSLY STATED.
I BELONG TO AND SUPPORT A WEB SITE THAT IS PREPARED TO BRING, INTO THE OPEN THE CORRUPTION BY LOCAL AUTHORITES AND “CONSERVATIONIST” INVOLVING OUR COMMON LANDS AND OTHER RIGHTS OF WAY.
ALL MATTERS WHICH I WOULD SHARE WITH MY LEGAL TEAM WILL BE ENTERED ONTO MY COLUM, ON THE WEB PAGE IN ORDER TO GIVE ENCOURAGEMENT FOR A CONTINUED FIGHT AGAINST THE CORRUPTION, AND TO SHOW, I FOLLOW THE SAME ADVICE I GIVE.
HORSEYTALK’S FREELANCE JOURALIST, PETER BIDDLECOMBE OPPERATES A FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND EXPRESSION WEB PAGE, I WOULD SUGGEST IF YOUR APPROACH TO THIS SITE IS KEEPING WITHIN THE LAWS OF THIS LAND, AND YOU ARE WILLING TO STANDBY WHAT YOU SAY, IT IS AVAILABLE.
MY APPLICATION WILL BE FOR DISCLOSURE OF PRE-REGISTRATION OF TITLES, PURPORTED TO HELD BY BERKELEY, ALSO FOR A SUMMONSE TO APPEAR BEFORE THE COURT.
MEMBERS OF BUTTERFLY CONSERVATION, TO START WITH THE “COMPANY SECRETARY WHO IS ALSO THE DIRECTOR OF FINAMCES AND DIRECTOR OF RESCOURCES, JULIE WILLAIMS, ALSO MARTIN WARREN CHIEF EXECUTIVE, JOHN DAVIS, JENNY JOY AND STEPHEN LEWIS, TO INCLUDE THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR FORGING A LETTER, CLAIMING IT TO HAVE BEEN WRITTEN BY DAVID ATTENBOROUGH.
FROM NATURAL ENGLAND, THE HEAD OF THE “LEGAL” JULIE LUNT, ALSO GLENYS TUCKER, HEAD LAND AGENT, BRUCE KEITH CHIEF SURVEYOR, MERVYN EVANS VALUER, WILIAM DU CROZ AND CHRIS HOGARTH TEAM LEADER FOR SHROPSHIRE.
WE ALSO HAVE THE SENIOR EXECITIVE AT SHROPSHIRE WILDLIFE TRUST.
FROM THE RURAL PAYMENTS AGENCY MARTIN TRURAN, THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE LEGAL DEPARTMENT.
THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF SHROPSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL IS COMPLICIT IN ALL OF THE WRONG DOINGS RELATING TO MY WRONGFUL ARRESTS AND FALSE IMPRISONMENT, AND ALL RELATE FALSE REPRESENTATIONS BY THE ABOVE NAMED PERSONS.
THE BILLY LIAR OF OUR CONSTABULARY SGT NEIL PARKER, NOW CID.
NICK CARTER HAS FALLEN OVER THE PADWORTH FENCE, THE SAME FATE WILL BEFALL ALL OTHERS IF WE STICK TOGETHER, THIS INCLUDES BHS, RAMBLERS AND ALL OTHER LOVERS OF OUR OPEN ACCESS LANDS.
"I do hope David Attenborough takes the issue, you recorded, of a letter being forged in his name VERY SERIOUSLY as much happens, within organisations, that executives do not know of but 'adopting' an executive name goes from deception to unlawfulness."
Says Steve Yandall
Thank you Tony.
We must all stand shoulder to shoulder with you as your case appears symptomatic of multiple cases of arbitrary '(in) justice' resulting in the contempt of both law and humanity in the UK of today.It is,of course,also the ideal climate within which individuals gain pecuniary advantage from the fraternal linkage that exists and ASSUMES rectitude rather than justifying it!
Whilst Common Land Law is complex(after 900 years it is likely to be) there is,as we know,no ignorance within the law and that really is the nub of the issue as those with the resources to exploit Common Land must be assumed to be expert within the law!Indeed they should be exemplars of that law.
I gain the impression that the complexity of Common Land Law creates a void that can be taken advantage of in the knowledge that challenges will be VERY rare and,as in your case,when challenges are made it impacts on the WHOLE establishment which,in response,closes ranks?
I do hope David Attenborough takes the issue, you recorded,of a letter being forged in his name VERY SERIOUSLY as much happens, within organisations, that executives do not know of but 'adopting' an executive name goes from deception to unlawfulness.