Says Adrienne Yentis
A friend of mine recently was riding on the heath
and she came across a group of cattle strung out across the bridlepath with no way through – the only way off was to turn round. Fortunately her horse
remained calm throughout. But you can imagine how a nervous horse might react ........... read more
Frensham Common, Surrey
PROOF. The National Trust does not own or have any other interest
on the common land apart from the burial mounds
- Waverley Borough Council and Surrey County Council CEO’s are equally guilty of collusion
- The alleged leases and conveyances, the land registration and lease agreements are fraudulent/created by false representation, thus all parties are guilty of Failure to disclose, False representation, abuse of office/position and loss and gain.
Says Tony Barnett
The National Trust claiming to be owners of Frensham commons, issued a lease agreement of the 333.19 hectares of lands of Frensham Commons to Waverley Borough Council.
This lease agreement is signed but not dated, the signee’s full name and official status is not given, the document is not witnessed and identified with full particulars of the signatory, and the lease is in total contravention of the charities act section 36 subsection 9 which is stated on the lease agreement.
I have been determined to gain this conclusive evidence to prove that the National Trust does not own or have any other interest on the common land apart from the burial mounds.
This includes my claims of them using the lands as collateral to gain payments from Waverley Borough Council, Farnham Angling Society, and the Sailing clubs on Frensham Great Pond. Waverley Borough Council and Surrey County Council CEO’s are equally guilty of collusion – submitting an application to PINS for consents for works and in issuing permits to non-commoners for the products registered as commoners rights.
To the application to Natural England for funding for materials for the use in regulating access and to include signage, both council and National Trust claiming to be owners, these acts are well catered for under the 2006 Fraud Act and must be dealt with immediately.
The Land Registry document is a collection of false statements and shows an advance state of dementia by the officer creating the document, which is first a registration of land to include leases and title absolute, the proprietor named as Waverley BC.
There is no evidence supplied, as is procedure on conveyance/purchase where no conveyance documents, no copy of pre-registration of titles, which the council should have received from the vendor/grantee on completion.
In conclusion I will state that the alleged leases and conveyances, the land registration and lease agreements are fraudulent/created by false representation, thus all parties are guilty of Failure to disclose, False representation, abuse of office/position and loss and gain.
The Charities Commission will assist the police in any investigation into the fraud I have uncovered. This is natural procedure in any case, this can be started through the county courts under section 41, I will prepare the litigation and gather statements from the sailing and angling clubs.
Says Linda Wright
We moved to a Shropshire location a year ago having surveyed the local OS map and noted the significant number of bridleways around the property. Sadly the map appears a total fiction. Scarce any of the bridleways are usable ........... read more