Horseytalk.net/Hoofbeat EXCLUSIVE
RIDER RIGHTS
Says Sandra Smith
The speed required to ensure that a gate closes is greater than the velocity required to amputate a finger, crush a child or the head of a dog, trap a push or wheelchair, or – literally - tear a hole in the side of a horse ......... read more
Yateley Common, West Berkshire
NOW CLAIMS ARE THE COUNCIL OWNS PART OF THE COMMON AND THE MOD OWNS THE OTHER PART ......... RUBBISH..
Says Tony Barnertt
YATELEY COMMON WAS REGISTERED IN 1926 AND 36 AS LAND CAPABLE OF RIGHTS OF COMMON, THE INFORMATION COLLECTED BY THE SOS WAS THAT IT WAS NOT FREEHOLD OR COPYHOLD.
IN 1965 UNDER THE CRA THE COMMON LAND WAS REGISTERED AS COMMON LAND, BUT AGAIN, ALTHOUGH WITHIN A MANOR, WAS NOT DEMESNE LANDS OF A LORDSHIPS MANOR AND FOR THE CRA WAS REGISTERED AS A SECTION 9, (NO OWNER COULD BE TRACED)
NOW CLAIMS ARE THE COUNCIL OWNS PART OF THE COMMON AND THE MOD OWNS THE OTHER PART, RUBBISH.
THE MOD ONLY HAVE THE LAND VESTED IN THE ARMED SERVICES BY THE SOS, WHO, FOR MILITARY PURPOSES REQUESITIONS THE LAND.
THE VESTING, HAS NO RIGHTS TO GRANT EASEMENTS WHATSOEVER AND MUST RETURN LAND AFTER DE-REQUISITION BACK TO THE STATE IN WHICH IT WAS BEFORE REQUESITION.
SECTION 47s1 OF THE 2006 COMMONS ACT, REPEALED THE RIGHTS OF "OWNERS" TO ENCLOSE "SURPLUS LANDS" TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE COMMONERS, SECTION 219 1285 ACT.
SECTION 47s2 PROHIBITS ANY FORM OF ENCLOSURE THAT MAY SUBSIST ALONGSIDE OF THE 1285 ACT.
APPLICATION TO PINS FOR WORKS UNDER SECTION 38 OF THE 2006 COMMONS ACT AS OWNERS, WITHOUT ANCIENT ROUTE TO TITLE TO PRE-DATE 1189 WILL AMOUNT TO FRAUD, FALSE REPRESENTATION CATERED FOR UNDER THE 2006 FRAUD ACT.
ANY CONSENT, s1 OF 38, WILL ONLY BE PROVISIONAL UNTIL EVIDENCE TO SHOW LAWFUL TITLE PRE 1189 HAS BEEN DISCLOSED, THIS IS THE MEANING OF "SUPPLEMENTARY" ISSUED WITH CONSENT.
ALSO, EVIDENCE THAT THE WORKS ARE NOT IN BREACH OF ANY BYE-LAWS BUT AS YATELEY IS RURAL THERE WILL NOT BE ANY BYE-LAWS.
IT HAS COME TO LIGHT THAT THE BHS ARE WILLING TO COMPROMISE/NEGOTIATE WITH THE COUNCIL AND NE, THIS ORGANISATION HAS NO REMIT OR JURISDICTION TO ENTER INTO ANY AGREEMENT ON WORKS OR IMPEDIMENTS WITH THE COUNCIL, NATURAL ENGLAND OR ANY OF THE OTHER DESPOTS, THEY ARE BEST ADVISED TO SUPPORT THE RIGHTS OF OPEN ACCESS AND TO DEMAND ALL PUBLIC ACCESS LANDS AND RIGHTS OF WAY TO BE FREE FROM IMPEDIMENTS.
NOT ALL HORSE RIDERS ARE BHS MEMBERS AND NOT ALL PEDESTRIANS ARE MEMBERS OF THE RAMBLERS, BUT HAVE JUST AS MUCH RIGHTS TO PEACEFUL ENJOYMENT ON THE RIGHTS OF WAY, DO NOT TRY TO DISCOUNT THESE MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC
Says Steve Yandall
Wise words Tony and,although you need no more,all parties should also be aware of both the Disability Discrimination Act and the Equality Act 2010 which both prescribe access rights that are denied by the imposition of regimes that result in exclusion.
Says Maureen Comber
I have been given an ASBO by the Hampshire County Council for standing up for riders rights.
How many other people have been silenced by Hampshire County Council? ........... read more