British Eventing
Horseytalk.net is now on Twitter

Horseytalk.net/Hoofbeat EXCLUSIVE
RIDER RIGHTS

click here to read more

The Governement should sycamore rider-friendly policy !

Chailey Common, East Sussex

Tony Barnett writes to Becky Shaw, East Sussex County Council

- MY INTENTION TO REMOVE THE WORKS CAN GO AHEAD WITHOUT PROSECUTION

- I WILL AGAIN ASK FOR THE EVIDENCE, OR CONFIRMATION THAT YOU WILL HAVE THE WORKS REMOVED AND THE HLS RETURNED TO THE PUBLIC PURSE.

- CHAILEY COMMON IS OPEN ACCESS TO PEDESTRIAN AND EQUESTRIAN.

Says Tony Barnett

Says Tony Barnett YOUR COLLEAGUES STILL WILL NOT FORWARD TO ME THE INFORMATION I HAVE APPLIED FOR YOUR FILES,

I HAVE REQUESTED THE IDENTITY OF THE PERSON THAT "GAVE" YOUR MR CLUBB/CHUBB THE RIGHTS TO MAKE AN APPLICATION TO PINS FOR CONSENT FOR WORKS ON CHAILEY COMMON.

MAY I SUGGEST TO YOU THAT THIS COMMON LAND IS A SECTION 45, THEREFORE NO ONE HAD LOCUS STAN-DI AND AS SUCH MY INTENTION TO REMOVE THE WORKS CAN GO A HEAD WITHOUT PROSECUTION, IT MAY HAVE ESCAPED YOUR ATTENTION THAT THE APPLICATION TO PINS WAS MADE UNDER FALSE REPRESENTATION (FRAUD 2006 ACT).

I WILL AGAIN ASK FOR THE EVIDENCE, OR CONFIRMATION THAT YOU WILL HAVE THE WORKS REMOVED AND THE HLS RETURNED TO THE PUBLIC PURSE.

CHAILEY COMMON IS OPEN ACCESS TO PEDESTRIAN AND EQUESTRIAN.

I pine for a more sensible approach to saving our forests

Read more here


Email this to a friend !!

Enter recipient's e-mail: