Says Tony Barnett

MR BATTY, ACTED AS "GRANTOR" TO THE COUNCIL, HE WAS NOT SEIZED OF THE THE PROPERTY IN FEE SIMPLE, IN FACT THIS COMMON LAND WAS NEVER PART OF ANY DEMENSE LANDS OF HIS LORDSHIPS MANOR, IN ESSENCE, THERE ARE NO PRE REGISTRATION OF TITLES TO THIS COMMON LAND, IF ANY TITLE DEED IS TO BE DISCLOSED, THEN THEY NEED TO SHOW REGISTERED TITLE PRE 1189, THIS THEN WOULD SHOW THE COMMON LAND AS DEMENSE LAND.

THEREFORE I WILL MOUNT A CHALLENGE BEFORE THE COURTS UNDER SECTION 41 OF THE ACT, FOR FULL DISCLOSURE.

CHORLEY WOOD COMMON IS A SECTION 45 COMMON, AND AS SUCH, AS I HAVE STATED HAS NO PRE REGISTRATION OF TITLES ATTACHED, THE LAND REGISTRY DOCUMENT HD470736 IS NOW BEFORE LEICESTER LAND REGISTRY, AT MY REQUEST AND IS TO BE EXAMINED DUE TO THE GRANTS OF EASEMENT MADE BY THE PARISH COUNCIL, WHICH, SUBJECT TO BATTY NOT HAVING LOCUS STAN-DI, ARE UNLAWFUL.

Chorleywood Common
Minutes of the Full Council 2012 Sept 25

The confidential discussion of grazing, and of the Council’s legal advice, at the last Committee meeting was minuted as follows: “The Council are still committed to grazing and are looking at ways of safely and legally facilitating grazing on the Common for nature conservation purposes. Until these investigations are completed, no grazing is planned to take place. Once the Council has agreed a way to proceed, further information would be made available.”

Chorleywood Common

Tony Barnett writes to Yvonne Merritt. Parish Clerk, Chorleywood Parish Council .......

TO SAY I AM ALARMED AT THE FLIMSY EVIDENCE YOU WISH TO RELY ON, IS AN UNDER STATEMENT.

Says Tony Barnett

TO SAY I AM ALARMED AT THE FLIMSY EVIDENCE YOU WISH TO RELY ON, IS AN UNDER STATEMENT.

YOUR MR BATTY HAD NO PRE REGISTRATION OF TITLES TO THE COMMON, THERE IS NO MENTION OF THE LAND BEING OF THE DEMENSE LANDS OF ANY LORDSHIPS ESTATE.

AS I BELIEVE THE GRANTS OF EASEMENT ARE UNSAFE, THIS WILL NEED TO BE BROUGHT BEFORE YOUR LOCAL COUNTY COURT UNDER SECTION 41 OF THE ACT FOR FULL DISCLOSURE OF ALL EVIDENCE.

THERE ARE SOME 32 GRANTS OF EASEMENT MADE BY CPC, WHICH WILL ALSO NEED EXAMINING, THESE MAY BE SUBJECT UNDER THE 2006 FRAUD ACT,

I HAVE ASKED YOUR COLLEAGUE IN YOUR ABSENCE TO BRING THESE CONCERNS TO YOUR BARRISTER.