Says Tony Barnett

KATRINA SPORLE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL APPLICATIONS/CONSENTS FOR WORKS ON COMMON LAND, OF COURSE THIS RESPONSIBILITY IS PASSED DOWN TO HER BY SECRETARY OF STATE CAROLYN SPELMAN, HOW EVER SPORLE PASSED THE RESPONSIBILITY DOWN TO GINA WARMAN(NOW LEFT OFFICE), SO ANY ANGRY COMPLAINTS WERE MADE TO WARMAN.

APPLICATIONS FOR DEVELOPMENT ON COMMON LAND TO THE PLANNING INSPECTORATE DO NOT HAVE TO BE ACCOMPANIED BY EVIDENCE OF RIGHTS TOO, ON OR OVER THE LAND, THEREFORE ANYONE MAY MAKE AN APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT/DEVELOP THE LAND OR CONSTRUCT ON THE LAND, THAT IS WHAT THE 2006 LEGISLATION PROVIDES.

ON A REFUSAL OF APPLICATION A REASON WILL BE GIVEN BY LETTER.

ON A CONSENT DOCUMENT THERE IS ALWAYS GIVEN A SUPPLEMENTARY/REMINDER/CAUTION CALL IT WHAT YOU WILL, MAKE INQUIRIES, OR ASK FOR A MORE DEFINED MEANING, AND YOU WILL BE TOLD IT MEANS WHAT IT SAY'S; PROVIDING THE WORKS ARE NOT IN BREACH OF ANY ENACTMENT, THEN THE WORKS WILL BE LAWFUL, SOMETIME'S WRITTEN IN A MORE COMPLICATED MANNER BUT IT MEANS THE SAME, THE APPLICANT MUST FIRST MAKE EVERY EFFORT TO SECURE NO BYE-LAWS OR OTHER ENACTMENTS WILL NOT BE BREACHED/BROKEN.

THE PERSON-S/ORGANISATIONS FILL IN THE APPLICATION FORM AS "A NONE COMMONER OR OWNER" BUT NOW WE HAVE CHARITIES, COUNCILS AND OTHERS MAKING APPLICATIONS TO THE PLANNING INSPECTORATE AS OWNER'S, OR AN EMPLOYEE OR MEMBER OF A CHARITY OR OTHER ORGANISATION ON THE BEHALF OF.

APPLICATIONS THEREFORE ARE NOT INVESTIGATED AS TOO CORRECTNESS OF CLAIM SUBMITTED.

SO IN MY SUBMISSION TOO THE PLANNING INSPECTORATE IS THE APPLICATION WAS IN BREACH OF THE 2006 FRAUD ACT, THAT OF FALSE REPRESENTATION, FAILURE TOO DISCLOSE AND ABUSE OF OFFICE AS A CHARITY, A SIMILAR CLAIM CANE BE LODGE AGAINST COUNCILS ETC.

THE APPLICATION FOR GATES, AND OTHER FORMS OF ENCLOSURE SHOULD HAVE BEEN REJECTED BECAUSE OF THE REPEAL OF THE ENCLOSURE ACT OF 1285 IN 2006, AND SHOULD ALSO HAVE BEEN TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION BY THE APPLICANT BEFORE COMMENCEMENT OF FENCING, ALL IN ALL DUE TO THE 2006 COMMONS ACT, ENCLOSURE OF COMMON LAND IS UNLAWFUL.

SCHEDULE 4 PARAGRAPH 6 OF THE 2006 COMMONS ACT PROVIDES THE PUBLIC WITH THE RIGHTS TO ENFORCE AGAINST UNLAWFUL WORKS ON COMMON LAND.

YET CHARITIES OR ANY OTHERS THAT IS SUPPORTED BY THE CORRUPT HEADS OF NATURAL ENGLAND POUL CHRISTENSEN AND DR HELEN PHILLIPS NOT FORGETTING CAROLYN SPELMAN SHOULD BE BROUGHT TO BOOK

I HAVE EVIDENCE OF COLLUSION BY MEMBERS OF BUTTERFLY CONSERVATION AND NATURAL ENGLAND INVOLVING COMMON LAND IN MY AREA, IT IS SPREADING.