Government seek views of public
as they launch Review of Environment Agency and Natural England
Environment Secretary Owen Paterson said, when launching the Review, he wanted to "capture the ideas of the people and groups who do so much for our environment about changes that would lead to better results for the environment, economic growth and for people right across England.”
There was once a time, however, when Mr Patterson was not concerned about changes "that would lead to better results for the environment, economic growth and for people right across England.”
THE ENVIRONMENT SECRETARY AND USING COMMON LAND
AS A DUMP FOR CHICKEN SHIT.
SAYS TONY BARNETT
OWEN PATERSON IS THE MP FOR NORTH SHROPSHIRE (UNFORTUNATELY FOR US AND NATURAL PHENOMENA AND WHITCHURCH HEATH COMMON LAND).
I AM ATTACHING PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE TO SHOW WHAT HAPPENS WHEN THE LIKES OF PATERSON, NATURAL ENGLAND, BUTTERFLY CONSERVATION, SHROPSHIRE WILDLIFE TRUST AND A BENT CORRUPT COUNCIL AND COUNCILLORS OF THIS AREA ARE CAPABLE OF, BUT WE MUST NOT FORGET THE OPEN SPACE SOCIETY, PINS, ENTRUST, LAND REGISTRY AND THE CHARITY COMMISSION, THE ENVIRONMENT AGENCY AND THE RURAL PAYMENTS AGENCY ALSO ARE IN COLLUSION.
DAMAGE CAUSED BY BUTTERFLY CONSERVATION
PATERSON IS NOW MR DEFRA, IS HE IN THAT POST SO THAT THE ONCE BEAUTIFUL NATURAL COUNTRY SIDE(COMMON LAND), UNDER HIS STEWARDSHIP CAN BECOME WASTELANDS ONLY FIT FOR DEVELOPMENT? IT IS WORTH TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION, LOOKING AT THE PHOTOS, PATERSON COULD CLAIM THAT THE AREA IS AN EYESORE, DEVOID OF ANY NATURAL SPECIES, THEREFORE BEST TO BE DEVELOPED.
THIS EXCUSE FOR AN MP HAS BEEN MADE AWARE OF THE DAMAGE VISITED ON AND OVER THIS REGISTERED COMMON, JA&O GRIFFITHS & SONS, POULTRY FARMERS HAVE USED THIS COMMON LAND AS A DUMP FOR POULTRY WASTE, AFTER PLOUGHING THE SHIT INTO THE SURFACE, HAVE SOWN CROPS, THESE ACTIONS ARE WANTON VANDALISM,
THEY HAVE EXTINGUISHED LAWFUL ACCESS AND THE PRODUCT FOR WHICH THE LAND IS REGISTERED.
The fields before they were purchased by Butterfly Conservation
THIS MAN IS PIG IGNORANT WHERE THE NEEDS AND LAWFUL RIGHTS OF OTHERS ARE THE ISSUE, I HAVE MADE NUMEROUS ATTEMPTS AT HAVING A MEETING WITH HIM OVER HIS CONSTITUTIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES, HE WOULD NOT VISIT A LOCAL SCHOOL THAT WAS PLAGUED WITH RATS AND FLIES, IF HE HAD HAVE DONE THEN THIS WOULD HAVE UPSET ONE OF HIS CRONIES, PATERSON IS LOOKING AFTER HIMSELF AT THE EXPENSE OF OTHERS AND THE ENVIRONMENT.
BUTTERFLY CONSERVATION, OR MEMBERS OF THAT CORRUPT CLAN, CLAIMED THAT THEY WERE PURCHASING PART OF OUR COMMON BUT UNDER ANN AKA, TO "SAVE" AND "CONSERVE" THE WILDLIFE ON THE COMMON, LOOKING AT THE NULLABOR THAT IS LEFT IS THE WAY OF THE "CONSERVATIONIST" PERHAPS I AM WRONG, MAY BE THEY HAVE SAVED THE WILDLIFE, PRESERVED IN TINS AND BOTTLES? OR, IN MUSEUMS. EUMS
PATERSON KNOWS THIS TO BE AN ACT OF CORRUPTION, THE COMMONERS, WHO'S RIGHTS WOULD BE EXTINGUISHED AS WELL AS PUBLIC OPEN ACCESS, MAIL SHOT HIM, HOPING THAT HE WOULD VISIT THE AREA AND SPEAK UP, PATERSON IS A SELF CENTRED COWARD, I BELIEVE THAT THIS ISSUE IS SOMETHING THAT HE IS UNABLE AND UNWILLING TO DEAL WITH.
PATERSON WAS ASKED TO VISIT AND TAKE ACTION
NATURAL ENGLAND AND SSSI HAS NO JURISDICTION ON LAND THAT THEY DO NOT OWN, OR LAND THAT THEY HAVE NO LAWFUL OCCUPATION, WE DO NOT NEED THESE SO CALLED CONSERVATION BODIES, RESPONSIBLE MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC ARE MORE THAN CAPABLE OF PREVENTING WANTON DESTRUCTION OF THE COUNTRYSIDE, THE LOCAL AUTHORITIES HAVE DIRECT ACCESS TO THE COURTS, PROTECTION OF SUCH AREA'S IS THEIR REMIT, GET RID OF THE "CONSERVATIONIST'S" AND QUANGO'S AND SAVE PUBLIC MONEY FROM BEING MISUSED, THIS WILL BRING DOWN THE DEBTS.
Says Steve Yandall
This is dynamite in terms of OP being promoted to minister with such a flawed history.
This needs forwarding,if you agree, to The Telegraph and The Guardian(specifically George Monbiot).The 'natural' battle lines are being drawn with 'our' representatives appearing to be selected on class and bias criteria(as ever) whilst those opposing their 'incursions' are denied rights by agencies that support ministers whilst compromising our greatest democratic gift---the legal framework of our nation.
This is an international phenomena that,as far as I can see, based on the finite amount of land(shrinking through inundation) relative to a massive global human overload that is being promoted by the same 'elite' being advanced to power.This also explains why basic agricultural sundries companies(Monsanto etc)have achieved such massive international political power which undermines duty of care and best practice and which is,and has been,a prime cause of compromising the natural quality of every global environment.
Contextually successive administrations are guilty of failing to protect children from predation by the powerful(despite knowing) and failing to investigate the causes of huge childhood mortality peaks near incinerators(thus allowing them 'denial').
Most humans have a prime response to protect children thus ANY failure to protect children must be indicative of the moral compass of those 'in the know' and their capabilities under other circumstances!Our environment falls under,as far as I am concerned, "other circumstances".
I cannot condemn all Parliamentary representatives but can express dismay that 600 people that are paid to give voice to constituents fail to do so and that those same 600 in my view, have failed to create commercial,moral and legal accountability for so many issues that are of huge import.
Says Craig Weatherhill
If an MP cannot grasp the basic facts of this case, then what good is he?
We have our MP telling us that we should "draw a line" under the past……NOT a bloody chance!
The past was when Natural "England" broke every law, rule and standard they could to impose their disastrous scheme which as discouraged public use of Carnyorth Common by as much as 75% (and what is the effect of THAT on the local economy?), and damaged a Scheduled Ancient Monument no less than 13 times in less than 4 years! Without any authority holding them to account for it. If an MP cannot grasp the basic facts of this case, then what good is he?
Review of Environment Agency and Natural England Views and supporting evidence are requested by 4 February 2013.
Preliminary conclusions will be published in the spring.
The review documents can be found at www.defra.gov.uk/review-ea-ne/
It will encourage others to do the same.