British Eventing
Horseytalk.net is now on Twitter
British Horse Society
NagMag
World Horse Welfare

Horseytalk.net/Hoofbeat EXCLUSIVE
RIDER RIGHTS

click here to read more

The Governement should sycamore rider-friendly policy !

Padworth Common

Tony Barnett writes to Richard Benyon, Parliamentary Under-Secretary
for Natural Environment, MP for Newbury

TO USE PROPERTY, IN THIS CASE PADWORTH COMMON AS COLLATERAL IS MORTGAGE FRAUD

FOR NATURAL ENGLAND TO USE REVENUE AS AN INDUCEMENT TO OBTAIN COUNCILS AND CHARITIES CO OPERATION TO CLAIM COMMON LAND AS FREEHOLD SO AS TO BRING SSSI IN UNDER THE DOOR, ALSO NEEDS TO BE INVESTIGATED.

Says Tony Barnett

Says Tony BarnettAS YOU ARE A MINISTER AT DEFRA, PART OF SECRETARY OF STATE MP SPELMANS COLLEAGUES, AND ALSO MP FOR THE AREA, I WRITE TO YOU NOT AS A CONSTITUENT, BUT AS A MINISTER FOR DEFRA.

THE ISSUES I WISH TO BRING TO YOUR ATTENTION IS THE APPLICATION BY AN EMPLOYEE OF WBC, FOR CONSENT FOR WORKS ON PADWORTH COMMON.

THE APPLICATION IS NOT COUNTER SIGNED BY NICK CARTER THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE, AND THERE IS NO SUPPORT SHOWN, ON THE DOCUMENT.

THE APPLICATION TO PINS, AND NOT TO THE CORRECT DEPARTMENT DEFRA, TO YOU, IS SUBMITTED AS AN OWNER COULD DO TO INCLUDE EVIDENCE OF OWNERSHIP.

NICK CARTER HAS BEEN CHALLENGED TO DISCLOSE DOCUMENTATION TO SHOW THAT OWNERSHIP OF PADWORTH COMMON IS HELD BY HIS OFFICE, HE HIMSELF WILL NOT RESPOND TO ANY INQUIRIES.

I HAVE HAD DISCLOSED TO ME THAT THERE ARE NO TITLE DEEDS AND THAT WBC DO NOT OWN PADWORTH COMMON, THIS INFORMATION HAS COME FROM THE OFFICER IN CHARGE OF COMMON LAND MATTERS.

CLAIMS ALSO WERE MADE THAT PADWORTH COMMON WAS SUBJECT TO SECTION 193, SINCE, IT HAS BEEN DISCLOSED, WITH AN APOLOGY THAT THE CLAIM WAS AN "ERROR", ALSO THAT THE COMMON WAS/IS SUBJECT TO 1899 ACT, HAS HAD DOUBT REGISTERED BY THE SAME OFFICER.

AS YOU WILL BE AWARE, THE PUBLIC INQUIRY WAS ADJOURNED BY THE PINS REPRESENTATIVE UNTIL 2013, AND AT THE MOMENT THERE IS CONTROVERSY AS TO WHO WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ADJOURNMENT.

MAY I LAY CLAIM TO BEING PART OF THE REASON?, THIS IS DUE TO THE CLAIMS BY S Mc WILLIAMS TO OWNERSHIP OF PADWORTH COMMON, NICK CARTER HAS NOT MADE THE STATEMENT, BUT AN EMPLOYEE WITH NO SUPPORT FROM EITHER THE LEGAL TEAM OR THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF WBC.

THIS IS A COUNCIL NOT FIT FOR OFFICE, THE APPLICATION TO PINS WAS SUBJECT TO FALSE REPRESENTATION (2006 FRAUD ACT), BUT PINS, BY ACCEPTING TO CONSIDER THE APPLICATION IS EMBROILED IN COLLUSION, MY STATEMENTS TO PINS CHIEF EXECUTIVE MIKE PITT WERE NOT EXAMINED, EVIDENCE THAT PAUL HENDRY OF WBC STATES THAT WBC DO NT OWN PADWORTH COMMON, YET HIS OFFICE ALLOWED THE HEARING, WHY?

THIS WAS MISUSE OF PUBLIC FUNDING!.

WHY ALSO WAS THERE NO DEMAND FROM PINS TO NICK CARTER FOR FULL DISCLOSURE?

PLANNING APPLICATIONS MUST INCLUDE SUCH DOCUMENTS TO SHOW THE CLAIMS ARE LAWFUL, WHICH PINS THEN SHOULD, IF NO DOCUMENTATION CAN BE DISCLOSED, SHOULD HAVE DISMISSED THE APPLICATION AND REFER THE FRAUDULENT ATTEMPTS AT DECEIVING HMRC AND THE RATEPAYER FOR PROSECUTION.

TO USE PROPERTY, IN THIS CASE PADWORTH COMMON AS COLLATERAL IS MORTGAGE FRAUD, FOR NATURAL ENGLAND TO USE REVENUE AS AN INDUCEMENT TO OBTAIN COUNCILS AND CHARITIES CO OPERATION TO CLAIM COMMON LAND AS FREEHOLD SO AS TO BRING SSSI IN UNDER THE DOOR, ALSO NEEDS TO BE INVESTIGATED.

MY REQUEST TO YOU, AS MINISTER FOR DEFRA, IS TO HAVE THE APPLICATION DISMISSED, SHOULD WBC WISH TO SUBMIT FURTHER APPLICATIONS, THEN IT MUST COME FROM NICK CARTER, AND TO YOUR DEPARTMENT, WE NEED TRANSPARENCY, NOT SKULDUGGERY.

I pine for a more sensible approach to saving our forests

Read more here


Email this to a friend !!

Enter recipient's e-mail: