British Eventing
Horseytalk.net is now on Twitter

British Horse Society
Stoneways Insurance Services
The Brooke

Horseytalk.net/Hoofbeat EXCLUSIVE
RIDER RIGHTS

click here to read more

The Governement should sycamore rider-friendly policy !

They're all in it together

Says Tony Barnett

Says Tony BarnettNATURAL ENGLAND-BUTTERFLY CONSERVATION- ENGLISH HERITAGE-WILDLIFE TRUSTS-RSPB AND PARASITES LIKE COMMONERS, ARE ALL IN IT TOGETHER.

BOB MILTON SENT ME AN EMAIL AND ATTACHMENTS REGARDING LANGSTRATH AND COOMBE FELLS IN CUMBRIA, WHERE AN APPLICATION FOR 400 METRES OF STOCK FENCING FOR THE ENCLOSURE OF THE AFORE MENTIONED PUBLIC OPEN SPACE.

SPACE, WHICH CAN BE LAWFULLY ACCESSED FROM ALL POINTS OF VIEW (READ THE CROW ACT 2000).

THE APPLICATION, MADE, BY H&H LAND AND PROPERTY Ltd BY RICHARD HUNTER, ARE THEY OWNER, OR JUST USING SECTION 23 OF THE NATIONAL TRUST ACT 1971, NO DOUBT UNQUALIFIED CONSENT BY NATIONAL TRUST HAS BEEN GAINED, BUT WHICH FACELESS WONDER GAVE THE NOD?

AS THERE IS NO OWNERS NAME GIVEN, THEN THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE BEFORE SPELMAN, SECRETARY OF STATE,AND NOT TO THE "YES MEN" CLUB PINS.

THIS IS COMMON LAND? THEREFORE THE FLAG OF CONVIENCE SSSI, HAS NO JURISDICTION ON COMMON LAND, SUCH AREAS ARE OF NATURAL OUTSTANDING BEAUTY,AREAS OF NATURAL PHENOMENA, BIO DIVERSITY, AREAS THAT ARE THERE FOR ALL TO ACCESS AND ENJOY!

THERE IS LEGAL RIGHTS TO DISTURB THE NATURAL FLORA AND FAUNA, HABITAT ETC BY PERSONS WITH REGISTERED RIGHTS OF COMMON AND OWNERS WITH QUASI RIGHTS, SHOOTING, TREE PLANTING, BUT NOT RIGHTS TO DISTURB OR TAKE AWAY COMMONERS RIGHTS.

COMMONERS ALSO HAVE OBLIGATIONS WHICH FAR OUTWEIGH THEIR RIGHTS.

THE 2006 COMMONS SUBSTANTIALLY RE ENACTED THE LEGISLATION WHICH STATES THAT A COMMONER "MAY NOT, LET,LEASE SELL OR EXTINGUISH THE RIGHTS AWAY FROM THE PROPERTY TO WHICH THE RIGHTS ARE REGISTERED, IN ESSENCE THE NOD FROM THE COMMONERS IS WORTHLESS.

THE APPLICATION GOES ON TO THE LAND LIES WITHIN A "SPARSELY" POPULATED AREA, THE BRITISH PEOPLE HAVE LAWFUL ACCESS FROM ALL POINTS OF VIEW, SO TO USE THE SMALL POPULATION OF THE AREA AS AN EXCUSE, CANNOT BE RIGHT, AND IS NOT RIGHT.

PINS AND THE APPLICANT MUST PROVIDE EVIDENCE TO THE CLAIMS THAT THE ENCLOSURE WILL BENEFIT THE NEIGHBOURHOOD, PERSONS LIKE ME WILL NOT GO UNDER, OVER ENCLOSURE NEITHER WILL ACCEPT GATES MY RIGHTS TO UNIMPEDED ACCESS FAR OUTWEIGHS UNLAWFUL ENCLOSURE.

THE STATEMENT ON THE APPLICATION FORM STATES" THE PROPOSED FENCING WILL CONSTITUTE A NEW IMPEDIMENT TO UNRESTRICTED PUBLIC ACCESS BUT IT IS NOT THE APPLICANTS INTENTION TO PREVENT ACCESS B......, IT PREVENTS LAWFUL ACCESS FROM ALL POINTS OF VIEW, THE ACCESS WILL ONLY BE ALLOWED BY STILES, WHAT ABOUT THE DISABLED?

THE CONCLUSION IS THAT THE FENCING WILL SERVE THE INTERESTS OF THE "OWNERS, WHO ARE THEY"? AND THE COMMONERS, WHICH THEY INTEND TO RESTRICT, COME ON!

THE APPROVAL OF KATE ASHBROOK OSS AND A FACELESS WONDER FROM NATIONAL HERITAGE GIVES GOOD REASON WHY SO CALLED PROTECTORS OF OUR LANDSCAPE AND RIGHTS TO ACCESS OPEN SPACES NEED CONSIGNING TO THE TIP.

OSS, NATURAL ENGLAND, WERE PART OF THE 2006 COMMONS ACT ON COMMON LAND.

LET ME POINT OUT TO THOSE WHO DON'T KNOW, BUT MORE SPECIFICALLY THOSE THAT DON'T WANT TO KNOW?

THE 1285 ACT SECTION 219 THE RIGHTS BY THE GENTRY TO ENCLOSE COMMON LANDS, WAS REPEALED BY SECTION 47 s1 OF THE 2006 ACT, FURTHER, SECTION 47 s2 OF THE 2006 ACT PROHIBITS ANY ACT OF ENCLOSURE THAT MAY SUBSIST ALONGSIDE THE 1285 ACT, FOR THOSE THAT HAVE THE STOMACH, SCHEDULE 4 PARAGRAPH 6 OF THE 2006 ACT EMPOWERS THE PUBLIC TO "ENFORCE" AGAINST UNLAWFUL WORKS ON COMMON LAND.

THE APPLICATION HAS, THROUGH RECKLESS DECISIONS HAS BEEN GIVEN, BUT, PINS RUNS WITH THE FOX AND HOUNDS, WITH EACH CONSENT COMES A SUPPLEMENTARY, WHICH MEANS THAT PROVIDING THE WORKS ARE NOT IN BREACH OF ANY

ENACTMENT OR BYE-LAW THEY WILL BE LAWFUL, MY ADVICE IS TO SEARCH THE COMMONS REGISTER, APPLY FOR ACCESS TO THE PUBLIC LIABILITY CERTIFICATE.

THE 2006 FRAUD ACT EXAMINES FALSE REPRESENTATIONS, ABUSE OF OFFICE, FAILURE TO DISCLOSE AND LOSS AND GAIN, THERE IS ALSO USING PROPERTY NOT OWNED AS COLLATERAL, I TAKE IT FROM THE INCLUSION OF HSL, FUNDING WILL BE AVAILABLE FROM NATURAL ENGLAND, TO WHO, NEEDS FURTHER

I pine for a more sensible approach to saving our forests

Read more here


Email this to a friend !!

Enter recipient's e-mail: