Thursley/Elstead/Ockley/Bagmoor and Royal commons
Says Tony Barnett
Says Tony Barnett
THE MOD ARE NOT CLAIMING ANY RIGHTS/USE TO COMMON LAND EXCEPT OCKLEY, BUT HE SAID IT IS RARELY USED AND THEY HAVE NOT INTENTION TO ENCLOSE.
I AM NOW WAITING TO SPEAK TO CLAIRE DOULTON FOR ACCESS/DISCLOSURE.
What a symbolic and unholy alliance the prospect of our armed forces
and Natural England present!
Riders,walkers the disabled and children all fall prey to this Crusading force that is quite rightly being described as putting the public under siege.
Says Steve Yandall.
Throughout history the combination of righteous intent,power,money and messianic zeal has left those involved as having commited some of the most horrendous crimes against humanity ever recorded but their 'absolution' came in the knowledge of having served a higher cause(not).
You may think "that's a bit strong" but think on. Lives may not be lost,as in past Crusades,but far more insidious means are being brought to bear.
We speak but no one listens.
We have laws but they fail to protect us.
We have rights that are not recognised.
We pay for that which we do not want.
We are presented with science that is invalidated.
We are arrested and criminalised for upholding our legal rights.
They create expertise/fraternal links by mutual agreement.
They fail to creat accountability.
They lay claim to salvation only when money appears.
They profess to public engagement whilst actively excluding the public.
They express surprise at opposition when documents from years ago record that opposition was likely.
They compromise our legal and sovereign heritage of 1000 years despite the armed forces being Her Majesties 'fiefs'.They thus undermine sovereigh power.
They employ appalling management practises which compromise our futures(HLS is a one trick pony).
They employ huge monies,the global measure of degradation,to achieve dubious objectives at a cost to other environments.
In 10 years time(the span of "sustainability")when large areas of HLS funded land have failed to benefit nature the structure of Natural England is such that they will already have 'spun' a response that justifies their future existence IF WE DO NOT STOP THIS FALSE NATURE,BY IMPOSITION.THAT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF OUR VOTED REPRESENTATIVES TO SORT OUT.
We must drive this major issue to ALL elected representatives as a seat winner and find representation at Wildlife Trust level to at least gain consideration of alternative management and land use on key areas.
Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II has knowledge of a wide range of abuses undertaken by her 'servants' and is also aware that this represents an erosion of her sovereign(and forebears)will.
I finish with a reflection on the credibility of Natural England.
Natural self sustaining heathland is one of the World's rarest environments and thus deserving of special attention(especially in the context of an industrialised Western nation).
SB Chapman(leading heathland researcher)stated that "it should NEVER be grazed".Natural England staff denied this environment existed,the HLS handbook made no reference to it and thus it is subject to degradation by the imposition of 'management'.Jim Paice(Agri minister),after I wrote to him, confirmed the existence of the environment but where is the surveying,studying and protection?
NE clearly see the man made as worthy and the natural as unworthy and have thus been reported to the United Nations.How can the West condemn rain forest clearance when failing a far rarer environment?
Marsupella profunda,the most heavily protected plant in the UK(and one of the rarest in the World),was declared,in 2006 "likely to become extinct".How can this be when 'glamour' species attract multi million pound funding?Chough,Corn Bunting,Blue Butterfy etc etc are brought back from the brink but Marsupella wallows in obscurity with little help to 'ensure' it achieves its prophetic end.It's last colonies ,in Cornwall, numbered 10 but has dropped to 6(2 of the losses are on European designated protected areas).
Again reported.This time to European legal enforcement as the legal obligation to take appropriate action to sustain the species has,in my view,not been complied with.
Does this sound like an 'expert' organisation or does it sound like the Frankenstein,Stalinist beast referred to by Ian Liddell Grainger MP(Bridgewater/Somerset?
He speaks for me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
MOD SAY'S THEY SOLD OCKLEY TO NATURAL ENGLAND, THIS IS VERY SUSPECT
Says Tony Barnett
THEY DO NOT REJECT ANY APPLICATION MADE BY EN, COUNCILS OR ANYONE OF THOSE, THEY RUN WITH THE FOX AND HOUNDS THUS;- CONSENT IS GIVEN BUT WITH A SUPPLEMENTRY WHICH SAY"PROVIDING THE WORKS ARE NOT IN BREACH OF ANY ENACTMENT/BYE-LAW THE WORKS WILL BE LAWFUL", IN OTHER WORDS PITT AND ALL BEFORE HIM WASH THEIR HANDS OF ANY RESPONSIBILITY, I HAVE POINTED OUT A FEW OF THE ENACTMENTS.
PLANNING INSPECTORATE KNOW THAT YOUR ONLY OBJECTION POST THE APPLICATION IS THROUGH THE COUNTY COURTS UNDER SECTION 41, YOU HAVE WASTED YOUR TIME AND MONEY.
WHAT YOU CAN DO, AND FORCEFULLY IS TO "DEMAND" A PUBLIC MEETING WITH THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR DEFRA, AND TO DEMAND DISCLOSURE BY THE CLAIMANTS, YOU, DO NOT HAVE TO PROVE ANYTHING.
THERE ARE TWO LETTERS FROM ME TO MIKE PITT AND ONE ANSWER ON HORSEYTALK.
THE CHAP FROM MOD SAY'S THEY SOLD OCKLEY TO NATURAL ENGLAND, THIS IS VERY SUSPECT, YOU NEED DISCLOSURE FORM NE UNDER FOI.