Horseytalk.net/Hoofbeat EXCLUSIVE
RIDER RIGHTS
TONY BARNETT WRITES TO SIR DAVID ATTENBOROUGH.
Says Tony Barnett
COMMON LAND?S HAVE FOR MANY YEARS BEEN ENJOYED AND TREASURED BY PEDESTRIAN AND THE HORSEY WORLD AS A PLACE FOR AIR AND EXERCISE, AND TO ENJOY THE ?NATURAL WORLD?.
NOW ACCESS IS MET WITH FENCING, GATES, DITCHES, EMBANKMENTS, THE PUBLIC ACCESS AND COMMONERS GRAZING RIGHTS HAVE BEEN EXTINGUISHED IN THE NAME OF ?ENHANCING BIO DIVERSITY? THROUGH THE PLOUGH.
SPRAYING, BURNING, AND CUTTING, OF INDIGINOUS PLANTLIFE, THUS REMOVING HABITAT OF THE WILD CREATURES, IS THIS WHAT YOU CALL ?CONSERVATION??
YOU HAVE BEEN MADE AWARE OF THE ACTIVITIES, YET DO NOTHING, IS THE HONOUR BESTOWED UPON YOU BEING SERVED CORRECTLY ?SIR?? I THINK NOT.
Writes Tony Barnett
IN 2009 I SENT YOU A COPY OF MY BOOK [AT THIS SAME ADDRESS] AND IN THE SAME YEAR AND SINCE THEN, ASSURED BY ?SIOBHAN LANE? YOUR MAIN CONTACT AT THE NATURAL HISTORY STUDIOS IN BRISTOL, THAT SHE HAS FORWARDED TO YOU MY EMAILS.
I HAVE NO REASON TO SUSPECT THAT ON EACH AND EVERY OCCASION, YOU HAVE RECEIVED MY CORRESPONDENCE, THEREFORE, THERE IS NO REASON WHY, IT CANNOT BE ASSUMED THAT THE ACCUSATIONS I HAVE LEVELLED TOWARDS ?WARREN MARTN, JOHN DAVIS, WILLIAM DUCROZ, JULIE WILLIAMS AND STEPHEN LEWIS? OF BUTTERFLY CONSERVATION, AND DR HELLEN PHILIPS, POUL CHRISTENSEN, GLENYS TUCKER, BRUCE KEITH, MERVYN EVANS AND CHRIS HOGARTH, PLUS OTHERS EMPLOYED BY NATURAL ENGLAND, NAMED IN MY BOOK, SHOULD NOT AND CANNOT BE LEVELLED AT YOU, WHICH IS ?FRAUD, COLLUSION, CRIMINAL DAMAGE AND PERJURY IN COURT?.
JOINTLY, ALL ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE THEFT OF OUR COMMON LANDS, THE EXTINGUISHMENT OF THE NATURAL PHENOMENA, WHICH, YOU, THROUGH THE NATURAL HISTORY PROGRAMS, CLAIM TO LOVE AND BE-FRIEND, RUBBISH.
MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC ARE BEING ARRESTED, VERBALLY ASSAULTED AND THREATENED WITH PROSECUTION FOR DEMONSTARTING AGAINTS THE CORRUPT CLAIMS OF OWNERSHIP AND RIGHTS TO MANAGE THROUGH OCCUPATION, BY BUTTERFLY CONSERVATION, NATURAL ENGLAND AND COUNCILS.
THESE COMMON LAND?S HAVE FOR MANY YEARS BEEN ENJOYED AND TREASURED BY PEDESTRIAN AND THE HORSEY WORLD AS A PLACE FOR AIR AND EXERCISE, AND TO ENJOY THE ?NATURAL WORLD?.
NOW ACCESS IS MET WITH FENCING, GATES, DITCHES, EMBANKMENTS, THE PUBLIC ACCESS AND COMMONERS GRAZING RIGHTS HAVE BEEN EXTINGUISHED IN THE NAME OF ?ENHANCING BIO DIVERSITY? THROUGH THE PLOUGH.
SPRAYING, BURNING, AND CUTTING, OF INDIGINOUS PLANTLIFE, THUS REMOVING HABITAT OF THE WILD CREATURES, IS THIS WHAT YOU CALL ?CONSERVATION??
YOU ARE THE PRESIDENT OF ?BUTTERFLY CONSERVATION? ONE OF THOSE CORRUPT CHARITIES WHICH IS INVOLVED WITH NATURAL ENGLAND.
YOU HAVE BEEN MADE AWARE OF THE ACTIVITIES, YET DO NOTHING, IS THE HONOUR BESTOWED UPON YOU BEING SERVED CORRECTLY ?SIR?? I THINK NOT.
Do you agree with Tony Barnett ?
Tony Barnett has requested meetings with Eric Pickles/Caroline Spelman
We ALL stand to lose very basic democratic rights if Tony is not supported.
Says Steve Yandall
In accord with government figure of 3%(relating to Registered Common land, I believe, and thus an underestimate) of England being 'Common Land' I can, with confidence, state that the issue of land set aside for common use and a huge part of our heritage dating back at least 800 years is under a far greater, and more insidious, threat than the direct change to our forestry estate that was stopped earlier this year.
Using the governments own description Common Land is typified by being unfenced and is a recreational resource when located close to population centres so why is fencing, exclusion, illegal claim grabbing and displacement to favour commercialism within the knowledge of DEFRA, Ministers, Local Authorities, grant funders and charities?
Quite simply because they can!!They believe us to be ill equipped, ignorant, apathetic, underresourced and powerless. Arrogance beyond belief in view of the reaction to the forestry debacle.
The establishment do, however, overlook the wider issue of their own non compliance with our greatest heritage(the law) and their own imposition equating to the worst our forebears had to suffer in terms of gaining the rights that our 'enlightened' representatives are currently, unlawfully, eroding.
Tony Barnett(Common Heritage) has requested meetings with Eric Pickles/Caroline Spelman to discuss and make representations to both ministers(Eric Pickles is too busy to meet Tony despite 3% of England being under threat from those he is responsible for).
Avoidance or busy workload? I leave it for you to judge.
3% of our landmass, to which we have rights, that directly effects a far higher % of people that, incidentally, are also being excluded from wide areas of open access land through the imposition of agri/env schemes that leave few truly openly accessible plots of land remaining open to all.
Could Orwell have forecast the above?
In view of the action Tony is initiating could I request that those of you that share my concerns do the following?
Tony is aiming for the reestablishment of the law relative to Common Land and the reestablishment of local rights relative to that land. My stance is that we ALL stand to lose very basic democratic rights if Tony is not supported.
Weight of numbers/publicity drove the previous forestry' initiative' to destruction.Both 'localism'and the 'big society' given a voice!
To retain our 'Common Rights' demands that we CLAIM the hollow construction of both 'localism' and the 'big society' as it is clear that, despite electoral promises, we are not to be given those rights.
Consider: