THE LATEST SCAM OPERATED BY HARTS COUNCIL WAS TO CLAIM OWNERSHIP OF YATELEY COMMON AND BECAUSE NO ONE OBJECTED THEY NOW SAY THAT THEY OWN THE COMMON LAND.

THAT'S LIKE SAYING A JACK RUSSELL BORN IN A STABLE IS A HORSE.

Says Tony Barnett

IT IS NOT MY PRACTICE TO IDENTIFY ANYONE THAT PASSES INFORMATION ETC..

BUT THE LATEST SCAM OPERATED BY HARTS COUNCIL OVER YATELEY COMMON IS THAT THEIR CLAIM TO OWNERSHIP WAS TO SEE IF ANYONE OBJECTED AND BECAUSE NO ONE DID, THEY NOW SAY THAT THEY OWN THE COMMON LAND.

THAT'S LIKE SAYING A JACK RUSSELL BORN IN A STABLE IS A HORSE.

THE COMMONS COMMISSIONER HAD RULED IN 1965, SUBJECT TO THE INFORMATION COLLECTED THROUGH CENSUS TAKEN BY THE UNIVERSITY OF WALES, THAT NO OWNER WITH THE CORRECT DOCUMENTATION(RE-REGISTRATION OF TITLES) FOR YATELEY COMMON COULD BE TRACED, VESTED THE LAND UNDER THE PROTECTION OF THE REGISTERING AUTHORITIES "HAMPSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL". SECTION 9.

THE COMMON LAND WAS ALSO REGISTERED AS COMMON LAND AND WITH COMMONERS RIGHTS, AFTER THE INFORMATION WAS CORRECTED AND RECORDED IN 1968, THEN BECAME FINAL IN 1974-5 AND CONCLUSIVE OF THAT REGISTRATION AND SUBJECT TO SECTION 10 OF THE ACT"FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE NEIGHBOURHOOD".

YATELEY COMMON IS THEREFORE OPEN ACCESS FROM ALL POINTS OF VIEW FOR PEDESTRIAN AND EQUESTRIAN.

ANY CLAIMS TO OWNERS, AS THE LEGISLATION ON COMMON LANDS PROVIDES, SHALL BE RECORDED ON A COMMON OWNERS REGISTER, BY THE REGISTERING AUTHORITIES, TO SHOW DETAILS OF THE TITLE DEEDS AND BE OPEN FOR INSPECTIONS BY THE PUBLIC AT ALL REASONABLE TIMES.

HAMPSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL HAVE STATED THAT THEY DO NOT OWN ANY COMMON LANDS IN HAMPSHIRE, THIS INCLUDES HARTS.

SINCE THEN OF COURSE I HAVE BEEN ASBO'D TO SAVE ANY EMBARRASSMENT TO THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE, ANDY SMITH AND THE "LEGAL" TEAM, YET, THE AGENDAS OF THE DISTRICT COUNCIL IS TO ENCLOSE THE COMMON LAND AND WITHOUT APPLYING TO PINS, BUT NO DOUBT ARE APPLYING FOR FUNDING TO CARRY OUT THE WORKS.

EVEN IF THE DISTRICT APPLIES OR NOT, THE WORKS WILL BE UNLAWFUL.

TO APPLY AS OWNERS IS FALSE REPRESENTATION (2006 FRAUD ACT) AND THEN TO APPLY FOR FUNDING AS OWNERS IS MORTGAGE FRAUD.

THE APPLICATION-S WILL NEED TO BE AUTHORISED BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE FROM THE REGISTERING AUTHORITIES AT COUNTY, WILL HE ? THE ANSWER IS NO, NONE OF THE APPLICATIONS BY OTHER BENT COUNCILS HAVE GAINED SUPPORT FROM THAT LEVEL, OR HIGHER THAN THE APPLICANT WHO IS LITTLE MORE THAN A GO-FER, (EXPENDABLE).

I HAVE SPOKEN TO PERSONS FROM THE AREA AND SUGGESTED THAT THEY DEMAND FROM THE COUNCILS DISCLOSURE OF EVIDENCE TO SHOW GOOD TITLE, COPIES OF ALL APPLICATIONS OF INTENTIONS TO BE OPEN FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION.

IT IS THE RIGHT AS PROVIDED IN 2006 LEGISLATION FOR ANY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC TO ENFORCE AGAINST ALL UNLAWFUL WORKS/DEVELOPMENTS ON COMMON LAND.