"You may have apply for my attendance at court, for this valid reasons are required by me. This statement should be taken seriously;There is no way that the alleged claimant is involved with this comedy of errors, therefore he will not take any part or surrender to any judgement given against him "

Says Tony Barnett

As further claims have been made by Porter, Powell and Gerzon, through print and as the council is subject to FOI, I will therefore use this email correspondence as my application for copies of the claimed documents.

The council through the three afore mentioned "legal" has applied to the lnad registry, as owners of the developed common land, and is shown on SL196129 created without full disclosure of copies of pre registration of title deeds (Quo Warranto 1189), then the claim is fraudulent, through false representation, abuse of office and failure to disclose, there is evidence of collusion, (2006 fraud act).

For this claim, I require copies of the third party liability certificate, copies of the pre-registration document as afore mentioned, copies of the accounts entry to show purchase/conveyance, copies of the consent to carryout works and copies of the blue print, copies of the signing off of the works by the clerk of works and copies of the exchange between council and develloper.

As you have stated that the developed area of common land is Whitchurch Heath Common, which you claim was purchased through fee simple, then I require copies of title deeds from the owners/vendor of that named common land, as the common was registered s9, the claims are to immature to be called fraud, like doctors and nurses played by children, to immature to be taken seriously.

The land register, this is where sheet 28 is recorded on the register map, Ken Harper did not register the land, that was your selves via Mr G Godber council clerk by 1968, subsequently this common land plus the remaining 61 were registered under s9, Ken Harper only registered his rights of common as is shown in this bundle, and, if you put on your glasses you will discover that the registration is on Whitchurch Heath Common CL21, and not on the also known as aka.

Also in the bundle is registrations scratched out, this was carried out on the 15/7/02 when I claimed the aka/logo prees heath, this of registration is signed and dated, the fraudulent document you have disclosed to show two previous claims are not signed and dated, there is no details of the applints or the receiving officer, the second claim was phoned in.

Just as corrupt as the councils land registration is that of Prees Heath, as indicated by the above date, the aka prees heath was registered by me in 2002 12 months before 30/9/03, you haven't shot yourselves in the foot but committed suicide, as you are not professional this is the act of the desparate.

The land deal exchange for common land that is unlawfully occupied by the Warren House shows the lack of integrity by the planning , the land is common land, the house is under the same demolition as the hangars.

Before any claim/act of fee simple can be claimed the property must of freehold, s9 shows that the land is not freehold, had you put brains in gear before making statements as in this one that exercise of powers of the 1899 commons act, you would have discovered that Whitchurch Heath Common CL21 is Rural, it is not borough or Urban, you also need to examine the other claim/statement, the 1925 law of property act (lands registration) has no record of this common land, but sections 193 & 194 does, rights of access and prevention of unlawful activities/developments (not doing very well are we?).

The conveyance and the following alleged lawful documents amount to false representations and will not be accepted by the profession.

The applications to Pins by Lewis and supported by this council are fraudulent, there is also a denial by the Lnad Registry that there is no link between butterfly conservation and it.

You may have apply for my attendance at court, for this valid reasons are rquired by me.

This statement should be taken seriously;There is no way that the alleged claimant is involved with this comedy of errors, therefore he will not take any part or surrender to any judgement given against him.