Horseytalk.net/Hoofbeat EXCLUSIVE
RIDER RIGHTS

click here to read more

The Governement should sycamore rider-friendly policy !

Broxhead, Hazeley Heath and Yateley Commons

Tony Barnett writes to Hampshire County Council Chief Executive, Andrew Smith

AS THIS COMMON LAND IS A SECTION 45 COMMON, THERE ARE NO RESTRICTIONS TO ACCESS UNLESS A COURT ORDER MAKES REGULATIONS SUBJECT TO COMPLAINTS.

I ASK YOU, ANDREW, MAY I HAVE DISCLOSED TO ME THE TITLE DEEDS (PRE REGISTRATION) ?

Says Tony Barnett

Says Tony BarnettI HAVE EMAILED BEFORE NOW OVER MATTERS REKATING TO COMMON LAND IN HAMPSHIRE.

YOU WILL ALSO HAVE THE KNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE HAD DIOLOUGE WITH YOUR COLLEAGUE ANDY GRATTON-KANE, AND KEVIN PURVICE.

THE OUTCOME HAS NEVER BEEN TRULY SATIFACTORY BECAUSE INFORMATION SURROUNDING THE STATUS OF THE COMMON LANDS MOSTLY IN CONTENTION “BROXHEAD” AND THE ONGOING SAGA OVER ALLEGED OWNERSHIP AND HCC’S TENANCY

BROXHEAD COMMON, AT THIS MOMENT IN TIME IS BEING CONSIDERED FOR COURT ACTION UNDER SECTION 41 2006 COMMONS ACT, FOR WHICH FULL DISCLOSURE OF DOCUMENTATION TO SHOW OWNERSHIP IS HELD BY PETER WHITFIELD.

AN APPLICATION WILL ALSO BE APPLIED FOR UNDER THE SAME ACT FOR DISCLOSURE OF THE COMMON OWNERS REGISTER, WHICH IS REQUIRED BY LAW TO SHOW THAT THE OWNER, PETER WHITFIELD IS REGISTERED AND COPIES OF HIS TITLE DEEDS ARE ATTACHED.

HAZELEY HEATH COMMON IS ALSO UNDER YOUR PROTECTION FROM UNLAWFUL ACTIVITES, NOT TOO DISSIMULAR FROM BROXHEAD WHERE CLAIMS TO OWNERSHIP AND EITHER A COMPLETED CONVEYANCE/PURCHASE, OR A CONVEYANCE/PURCHASE NEGOTIATIONS ARE IN PROGRESS.

THE HAZELEY HEATH COMMON; YOUR DISTRICT COUNCIL “HARTS” CLAIM TO OWN PART OF THAT COMMON AND A FAMILY CALLED “TIMPANAY”? OWN THE REST AND HAVE OR STILL ARE ENTERING, TO GETHER WITH THE RSPB INTO NEGOTIATIONS FOR A SALE/PURCHASE.

AN APPLICATION FOR HLF FUNDING HAS BEEN MADE BY RSPB WITH THE COLLUSION OF HARTS DISTRICT COUNCIL, DESPITE YOUR COLLEAGUE KEVIN PURVICE STATING THAT THE COUNCIL HAVE NO ASSOCIATION WITH THE COMMON, INDEED MR PURVICE GAVE ME THAT ASSURANCE AFTER EXAMINING A COPY OF THE PLAN OF HAZELEY HEATH COMMON WHICH AT THE TIME WAS BEFORE HIM.

WE ALSO HAVE YATELEY COMMON, WHICH IS ALSO UNDER YOUR PROTECTION, YET THIS TOO HAS HAD APPLICATIONS FOR HSL FUNDING MADE, AS OF YET NO APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING INSPECTORATE FOR CONSENT FOR WORKS AND A PUBLIC ENQUIRY AS BEEN MADE.

YOU WILL NO DOUBT BE AWARE OF THE DANGERS OF FALSE REPRESENTATIONS?

I NOW HAVE CORRESPONDENCE FROM JUDITH DOWNING WITH BACKING KAREN MURRAY, “INDIRECTLY”, INFERING MY QUESTION AND REQUESTS ARE OF A VEXATIOUS MANNER, UNREASONABLE IS THE WORD USED.

MY CONTACTS FORMERLY WERE WITH THE COUNTRYSIDE TEAM, AND THEN BECAUSE MY REQUESTS WERE OUTSIDE THE REMIT OF THAT TEAM, I WAS DIRECTED TO ANDY GRATTON – KANE.

I HAVE NO DOUBT THAT ANDY FOLLOWED PROCEDURE AND OBLIGED AS FAR AS HE COULD.

HOWEVER, EVIDENCE OF TITLE DEEDS TO SHOW THAT PETER WHITFIELD OWNED THE COMMON LAND WAS NEVER DISCLOSED, BUT AN ENTRY ON A LESS THAN SATISFACTORY COMMON OWNERS REGISTER DID NOT ADVISE ON WHAT DOCUMENTS WERE SHOWN TO PERSUADE HCC TO REGISTER HIM AS OWNER.

WITHOUT SUCH DISCLOSURE, HCC ENTERED INTO A LEASE AGREEMENT WITH WHITFIELD, IS PUBLIC MONEY BEING USED, ON WHAT GROUNDS?

THEN HCC ENTERED INTO A LEASE AGREEMENT FOR SSSI YOU HAD NO POWER TO DO SO.

REQUESTS FOR THAT INFORMATION TO SHOW THE LEGALLITY IS ALL I HAVE REQUESTED, IF AT ALL IT IS LEGAL THERE SHOULD BE NO HESTITATION IN DISCLOSING.

MY ATTENTION THEREFORE WAS TRANSFERRED TO YOUR LEGAL DEPARTMENT, YET THE CRIES OF HARASMENT COME FROM A DIFFERENT DEPARTMENT.

I ASK YOU ANDREW, MAY I HAVE DISCLOSED TO ME THE TITLE DEEDS (PRE REGISTRATION).

I pine for a more sensible approach to saving our forests

Read more here


Email this to a friend !!

Enter recipient's e-mail: