Says Tony Barnett

MYSELF AND OTHER MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC HAVE SERIOUS QUESTIONS.

WHY IS IT NECESSARY TO ENCLOSE COMMON LAND, TO PREVENT OPEN PUBLIC ACCESS?

HAS THERE BEEN ANY REPORTS OF CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES WHERE THE POLICE AND COURTS HAVE BEEN ASKED TO DEAL WITH?

OR, AS WE ALL SUSPECT, IS THIS A WAY TO OBTAIN HLS FUNDING TO SUPPLEMENT THE COUNCILS BANK BALANCE?

AS YOU WILL RECALL, BCC HAD A DISMAL FAILURE IN TRYING TO ENCLOSE PADWORTH COMMON, WHATEVER THE REASONS BEHIND THAT FAILURE, WILL REAPPEAR AGAIN IN YOUR ATTEMPT AT MAKING MONEY OUT THIS VENTURE TO OBTAIN HLS FUNDING IN ORDER TO ENCLOSE CROOKHAM COMMON.

SHOULD BCC TRY TO RE-APPLY FOR THE ENCLOSURE OF PADWORTH, IN THE SAME PRETENTIOUS WAY APPLICATIONS WERE SUBMITTED BEFORE, FALSE REPRESENTATIONS ARE STILL COVERED UNDER THE 2006 FRAUD ACT.

THIS ACT ALSO COVERS APPLICATIONS FOR ENCLOSURE OF CROOKHAM COMMON, SO YOUR WAY FORWARD IS BY WAY OF AN HONEST DECLARATION, WHICH WILL NEED THE SUPPORT OF THE SAME RATE PAYERS YOU TRIED TO MISLEAD BEFORE.

THE 2006 COMMONS ACT REPEALED THE RIGHTS OF LAWFUL ENCLOSURE BY TITLE DEED HOLDERS, UNDER THE 2006 COMMONS ACT (SECTION 47-1 REPEALED THE 1285 s219 RIGHTS TO ENCLOSE, AND 47-2 PROHIBITS ANY FORM OF ENCLOSURE THAT MAY SUBSIST ALONG SIDE THE 1285 COMMONS ACT).

TO USE THE COMMON LAND FOR THE PURPOSE OF OBTAINING HLS FUNDING, IS COVERED UNDER THE MORTGAGE FRAUD LEGISLATION, SEE CONVEYANCING.