Says Naomi Smith
It is all too possible to round a corner on horseback and come upon a group of cattle with no prior warning -this WILL result in a horse being badly spooked at best, bolting at worst -it is only a matter of time ........... read more
Tony Barnett writes to the leaders of the "OUT" Campaign.
"Give us a country and legal system that we can all be proud of. "
Says Tony Barnett
I write to you as ministers with responsibilities/front bench etc,also to say thanks for standing up to exit the EU.
There may be emails and other documents held with the Justice secretary Mr. Gove's office from me over the past 15 years,these communications was felt important to me and other in my county but not too our MP Paterson or Mr. Pickles or any labour cabinet members.
You Mr. Grayling I saw a few years ago when I was leaving No 10 after delivering a letter regarding the lack or refusal to examine my claims of fraud by local authorities and charities but Mr.Pickles would not even respond,our MP Paterson was just as bad,but they were not on their own when it comes down challenging local authorities,charities,planning inspectorate and natural England,all this has been left to the individual to sort out,none of the MP's contacted would become involved with constituents concerns.
Blair and his cronies,dismissed the commons commissioner and put in place PINS,that is like putting ISIS in charge of democracy, because pins have have no qualifications in conveyance or common land legislation, its decision to give consent to planning applications is without knowledge of the the implications such consents create.
There is evidence in legislation common land registration,on the conveyance procedures that can bring into the equation the 2006 fraud act like false representation,each consent given is issued with a supplementary which states, as long as the works are not in breach of any enactment or bye-law they will be lawful,first breach is false representation 2006 fraud act,there is no actual consent given then according to those conditions,yet,the courts will accept without any hesitation.
I and many of of my colleagues have been let down by the legal system over rites under the Magna Carta (innocent until proven guilty) the ECHR also provides the same protection as in article 6,yet because the local authorities are the ones making false representations or charities etc that the authorities are in favor of,courts will not allow article 6 and the police will not observe article 7, so how can the "stay in's" say we are better off,I have been arrested and charged for criminal acts, when the courts will state that the matters are civil and outside it's jurisdiction but carries on with the trial, full disclosure and witnesses are refused yet I am found,not proven guilty and penalties are awarded.
As a result of this behavior innocent members of the public are losing rites of access to open countryside to include common lands and bridleways which have ancient routes for rites,councils are claiming HLS to land they have no jurisdiction (1965 commons act no interest in the soil) and it cannot comply with section 4 of the act,this is where our MP's and courts should be seen to be defending the innocent and prosecuting the offenders instead of the other way round, even if MP's do not wish to allow European rites,why then will MP's not honor the statute Magna Carta,on balance MP's , courts,police,solicitor's and councils are failing the British people,judges are committing courtroom, fraud,solicitors are just as guilty through court niceties too Judges,police threaten objectors to the fraudulent activities with a section 5.
Give us a country and legal system that we can all be proud of.
Says Linda Wright
We moved to a Shropshire location a year ago having surveyed the local OS map and noted the significant number of bridleways around the property. Sadly the map appears a total fiction. Scarce any of the bridleways are usable ........... read more