Says Tony Barnett

I WRITE TO YOU SUBJECT TO MY CONCERNS OF WRONGFULLY ISSUED LAND REGISTRATION DOCUMENTS, ISSUED.

REGISTRATION DOCUMENTS HAVE AND STILL ARE BEING GRANTED TO APPLICANTS WITHOUT FULL DISCLOSURE OF OF PRE REGISTRATION OF TITLE DEEDS, TO SHOW OWNERSHIP OF REGISTERED COMMON LANDS IN ENGLAND AND WALES.

IN ESSENCE, PROCEDURE AS IS SET DOWN BY GOVERNMENT, IS NOT BEING COMPLIED WITH, THIS IS PROCEDURE THAT LAND REGISTRY DEMANDS TO BE COMPLIED, YET THERE ARE OFFICERS, EMPLOYED BY THIS GOVERNMENT OFFICE THAT DO NOT COMPLY WITH THAT ORDER.

I HAVE EVIDENCE TO SHOW THAT LAND REGISTRY DOCUMENTS ARE GIVEN WHERE ONLY "EPITOME'S,CONVEYANCE AND INDENTURES" HAVE BEEN ACCEPTED AS EVIDENCE OF GOOD TITLE, NEITHER DOCUMENT HAS THE BENEFIT OF TITLE DEEDS TO SHOW SUPPORT.

LAND REGISTRY OFFICES I AM IN CONTACT WITH OVER SUCH DERELICTION OF DUTY ARE BASED I TELFORD,LEICESTER, GLOUCESTER,COVENTRY AND CROYDON.

COMMON LANDS INVOLVED ARE IN COUNTIES SHROPSHIRE,WORCESTER,HANTS,BERKS,HERTS.SURREY,SUSSEX, INVOLVING COUNCILS AND SUCH CHARITIES AS BUTTERFLY CONSERVATION AND WILDLIFE TRUST'S, EACH AND EVERYONE HAS OBTAINED A LAND REGISTRY DOCUMENT WITHOUT DISCLOSING PRE REGISTRATION OF TITLES, TOO MANY TO CLAIM "IN ERROR".

SUBJECT TO THESE LAND REGISTRY DOCUMENTS, CASH FUNDING HAS BEEN OBTAINED, BUT MOST CONCERNING IS THE ARREST AND COURT APPEARANCES OF MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC, I HAVE BEEN TO COURT FIVE TIMES THIS YEAR ALONE SUBJECT TO "EVIDENCE" BY AN UNLAWFULLY OBTAINED LAND REGISTRY DOCUMENT, WITH A FURTHER TWO MORE THIS YEAR BEFORE A CROWN COURT WITH A JURY(AT MY REQUEST) ND ONE AT WORCESTER COUNTY SOURT WITH OTHERS IN RELATION TO FALSE CLAIMS BY THE COUNCIL, AFTER DISCLOSING A LAND REGISTRY DOCUMENT OBTAINED BY DISCLOSURE OF A CONVEYANCE DOCUMENT.

Says Steve Yandall

I agree with all you have said.The clear links and barriers created by a fraternal group of 'public servants'(QUANGO's/NGO's/LA's etc) that exclude public rights and best practise from their own agendas is resulting in an anarchic imposition that threatens democratic practices established over centuries.

examples;
Incinerators----"no evidence of harm"!In fact Parliament found there were health issues,and censured those responsible for false information over 10 years ago.
HLS--------------Natural England have been unlawful on many occassions without being accounted for.
Disability discrimination---LA's/QUANGO's choose to ignore legislation when it suits(Colin Chadburn/HEATH Project).
Due process----Hollie Greig.Whether the claims wewre correct,or not,this case was not subjected to due process.

Public inquiries-preferential regard given to 'government family evidence' with little investigation of their actual expertise.Incinerator inquiries,as an example,continue to accept evidence from the EA,Natural England despite both organisations failing to be veracious and failing to investigate the issues they were questioned on(health and Marsupella profunda).